Skip to content

Grammar & usage / Regional (Québec)

Québec anglicisms and calques

Levels: B1, B2, C1

Summary

Contact with English gives Québec French a layer of casual borrowings and loan translations such as c'est le fun, canceller and tomber en amour, yet the same variety often keeps or coins French where Europe borrows English, as with courriel, clavardage, stationnement and arrêt; the result is strongly register-dependent and shaped by deliberate language planning.

Explanation

The relationship between Québec French and English is more complex than the cliché that Québécois speak a heavily anglicized French. Two opposite tendencies coexist. On one hand, centuries of close contact with English, especially in everyday and workplace speech, have left a visible layer of borrowings and loan translations. On the other hand, Québec has been unusually active in resisting English in formal, written, and official usage, often keeping or inventing French terms precisely where European French has adopted the English word. Understanding the variety means holding both facts at once.

Several types of English influence can be distinguished. Direct loans take an English word into French, sometimes with French verb endings, as with canceller (to cancel), checker (to check), and the noun la job (a job). Adapted loans are reshaped to French phonology and morphology over time. Calques, or loan translations, copy an English structure with French words: tomber en amour reproduces to fall in love, prendre une marche reproduces to take a walk, and être correct in the sense of to be fine or okay parallels an English usage. The English-origin noun le fun is so embedded that c'est le fun simply means it's fun and avoir du fun means to have fun.

These items are overwhelmingly features of informal, spoken register. In relaxed conversation they pass without notice and carry no stigma among speakers; many are the most natural way to express the idea. The same speaker, writing a report, addressing a meeting, or speaking on the air, will typically switch to the standard French equivalent: annuler for canceller, vérifier for checker, un emploi for une job, tomber amoureux for tomber en amour. Register sensitivity, knowing which words belong to the kitchen table and which to the written page, is therefore central, and it is precisely this awareness that the borrowings test in a learner.

The mirror image is just as characteristic and often surprises outsiders. In many domains Québec French is more resistant to English than European French. The most cited example is courriel for email, a Québec coinage now used in official French generally, where France long wrote e-mail or mail. Clavardage (online chat, a blend of clavier and bavardage), stationnement for parking, magasinage for shopping, and traversier for ferry are further cases where Québec keeps or builds French while France borrows. On the road, Québec stop signs read ARRÊT, whereas signs in France read STOP, a small but emblematic difference.

This second tendency is not accidental; it is the product of deliberate language planning. Québec institutions devoted to the French language publish recommended terminology and propose French equivalents for new technical and commercial vocabulary, and these recommendations carry real weight in administration, business, and the media. The broader legal framework that makes French the official and normal language of public life reinforces a culture in which finding or coining a French term, rather than importing the English one, is the expected default in formal contexts. The high status of French as an identity marker in Québec gives this effort a social motivation that is often stronger than in Europe.

The outcome is a genuine split by register and domain rather than a uniform level of anglicization. Casual speech may contain more visible English-derived material than ordinary speech in France, while formal Québec writing may contain less. A learner who concludes from a relaxed conversation that anything English-sounding is acceptable will produce jarring text in a professional setting; a learner who studies only the official terminology will miss how people actually talk. Both registers are authentic, and competent speakers move between them according to situation.

Some caution about the term anglicism itself is warranted. Whether a given word counts as an unwanted anglicism, a fully integrated loan, or simply a normal French word is partly a matter of judgement and sometimes of debate, and attitudes have shifted over time. A number of older borrowings are now thoroughly naturalized and no one questions them; others are actively discouraged in careful usage. The descriptive point for a learner is to observe which items attract correction and which pass unremarked, rather than to assume that every English-looking word is either fine or wrong.

Practically, the most useful skill is mapping casual borrowings to their neutral or formal equivalents and choosing by context: c'est le fun beside c'est plaisant or c'est agréable; canceller beside annuler; checker beside vérifier; une job beside un emploi; tomber en amour beside tomber amoureux. Receptively, expect both the relaxed loans and the deliberately French terms, and do not be surprised that the email you receive is un courriel sent about an arrêt rather than a stop. This rule surveys the pattern and its social logic; it is not an exhaustive inventory, since the boundary between borrowing and standard usage keeps moving.

Examples

C'est le fun, mais checke ben l'heure, faut pas être en retard.It's fun, but keep an eye on the time, we can't be late. (Informal borrowings: le fun (fun) and the verb checker (to check); ben is a reduced bien. Neutral equivalents: c'est plaisant, regarder / vérifier l'heure.)

Ils sont tombés en amour pendant un voyage.They fell in love during a trip. (Calque of English to fall in love; standard French is tomber amoureux / tomber amoureuse.)

Faut canceller la réservation, le souper est annulé.We have to cancel the reservation, dinner is off. (canceller (to cancel) is an informal loan; the formal verb is annuler, used in the same sentence here.)

Je t'envoie ça par courriel ce soir.I'll send you that by email tonight. (Here Québec uses the French coinage courriel rather than the English-based email / mail common in France.)

On se rejoint au stationnement à côté de l'arrêt.Let's meet at the parking lot next to the stop sign. (stationnement (parking) and arrêt (stop) are French where France typically uses parking and, on signs, STOP.)

On a clavardé une heure avant de se voir.We chatted online for an hour before meeting up. (clavarder / clavardage (to chat / online chat) is a Québec coinage; France generally uses chatter / le chat.)

Veux-tu venir prendre une marche après le souper?Do you want to come for a walk after supper? (prendre une marche is a calque of to take a walk; standard French is faire une promenade / se promener.)

Inquiète-toi pas, tout est correct de mon bord.Don't worry, everything's fine on my end. (être correct in the sense of to be fine / okay parallels English usage; de mon bord means on my side / end.)

J'ai trouvé une bonne job dans une compagnie de Québec.I found a good job at a company in Quebec City. (la job (feminine in Québec) is an informal loan; the neutral term is un emploi. France French treats the borrowed job as masculine and very informal.)

Common mistakes

Incorrect: J'ai appliqué pour la job hier.

Correct: J'ai postulé pour l'emploi hier. / J'ai posé ma candidature hier.

Appliquer pour (un emploi) is a calque of English to apply for, but in standard French appliquer does not mean to submit a job application; the usual verbs are postuler (à / pour un poste) or poser sa candidature. The pitfall is double for English speakers in Québec: they import the English structure with appliquer, and they reach for the informal loan la job where a neutral or formal context calls for un emploi or un poste. The borrowing la job exists in casual Québec speech, but in writing or any formal setting the expected phrasing is postuler à un poste or poser sa candidature à un emploi. (Note: appliquer une crème or appliquer une règle, in the sense of to apply something onto / to put into effect, is perfectly correct French; only the to apply for a job sense is the calque.)

Related rules

quebeccanadian-frenchanglicismsregisterlanguage-policy